Warchant.com - Message Boards
ShopMobileRadio RSSRivals.com Yahoo! Sports


Tomahawks
Register User Options
Site: Forum:


Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply   Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Previous Topic | Next Topic | Back to Topics


Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
Possibly a slow/subtle retreat back to sanity. They can't (or won't) admit a colossal mistake. Wouldn't be surprised to see some gradual fade to black for Chief Walmart. Will be interesting....

Posted from wireless.rivals.com


Man that would be great.  Everytime I see it I feel disgusted.
6/27 2:33 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by ChopHouse:

How about this little gem from Pig: "3 months after a national title OUR INEPT ADMINISTRATION lets a friggin walmart debut such a monumental event". 
Please point out to me how our admin played any part in the botched unvailing.

EASY answer ... they played a part in the botched unveiling by creating that piece of male cow excrement in the first place.
If they didn't create that garbage, there would be no botched unveiling.
Thank you and goodnight!
6/27 2:35 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by BillWesJay:



Originally posted by ChopHouse:





Pig, you certainly don't let facts get in the way of your angst.
Just about everything that you say in your rant is totally false.
To say that you are a master of stretching the truth is an understatement.




Chop House... you were proven to have told an outrageous lie on this issue, and you admitted such. 

Are you calling Pig out because he only "stretched the truth" as opposed to making up complete fabrications like yourself? 



-I am starting to think that the pro logo guys all have major mental issues that are coming to roost.
Well, Bill, we can agree on one thing, Pig can sure "stretch the truth".

As for mental issues, I think that OBSESSION might fall into the catagory of a mental issue.
And nobody can deny that we have quite a few toothless logo advocates that have a persistent preoccupation with their feelings regarding the new and improved logo.

.

.
6/27 2:38 PM | IP: Logged
New tag looks AWESOME!!!

Thank you, thank you Boosters for sparing us from the new logo!
6/27 2:39 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by BacardiNole:
Boosters won't take credit for it but this was a very smart decision on their part.  They deserve credit for turning a blind eye to monk's pathetic logo and putting something their customers find palatable.
Your agenda is getting old. Monk has nothing to do with the designs of the new logo, he has many job descriptions but designer is not one of them. A lot of things went on with the athletic department last year and Monk had to be the spokesman at times. He has to be the go between the AD and coaches, boosters, players, fans, etc.. He's texted me at midnight and 5 am the next morning, I have no idea when he sleeps It's a thankless job and we should be proud to have a ex player from our all time team work so hard for us. He's also close with all of our coaches and I'm sure they don't appreciate our own attacking him. 
6/27 2:42 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by angriffnole:


Originally posted by wrdsmth:
First, angriffnole?

Indians originate from India.

Don't feign respect and then show a lack of it.

Second, ChopHouse?

This is me  laughing at you.





You are yellow, round and have no arms or legs??

Yup.  That's how I roll. 
6/27 2:43 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by RycheNNole:

Originally posted by ChopHouse:

How about this little gem from Pig: "3 months after a national title OUR INEPT ADMINISTRATION lets a friggin walmart debut such a monumental event". 
Please point out to me how our admin played any part in the botched unvailing.

EASY answer ... they played a part in the botched unveiling by creating that piece of male cow excrement in the first place.
If they didn't create that garbage, there would be no botched unveiling.
Thank you and goodnight!


Originally posted by RycheNNole:

Originally posted by ChopHouse:

How about this little gem from Pig: "3 months after a national title OUR INEPT ADMINISTRATION lets a friggin walmart debut such a monumental event". 
Please point out to me how our admin played any part in the botched unvailing.

EASY answer ... they played a part in the botched unveiling by creating that piece of male cow excrement in the first place.
If they didn't create that garbage, there would be no botched unveiling.
Thank you and goodnight!
Lame, Ryche.
If the sun didn't come up this morning it would still be dark
6/27 2:44 PM | IP: Logged
It is the truth, plain and simple.
The fact you think the truth is lame, well ...
6/27 2:48 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by jamnolfin:


Originally posted by BacardiNole:
Boosters won't take credit for it but this was a very smart decision on their part.  They deserve credit for turning a blind eye to monk's pathetic logo and putting something their customers find palatable.
Your agenda is getting old. Monk has nothing to do with the designs of the new logo, he has many job descriptions but designer is not one of them. A lot of things went on with the athletic department last year and Monk had to be the spokesman at times. He has to be the go between the AD and coaches, boosters, players, fans, etc.. He's texted me at midnight and 5 am the next morning, I have no idea when he sleeps It's a thankless job and we should be proud to have a ex player from our all time team work so hard for us. He's also close with all of our coaches and I'm sure they don't appreciate our own attacking him. 

Monk has done more for our university than all of the toothless logo advocates combined.
It's abominable that we have a few petulent nay-sayers who attack others without any first-hand knowledge of any facts whatsoever.
6/27 3:04 PM | IP: Logged
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
6/27 3:17 PM | IP: Logged
ChopHouse, you're a proven liar. Your words have zero meaning, even if you start telling the truth.
6/27 3:20 PM | IP: Logged
Lol, Monk is way in over his head. and fits right in as part of our inept FSU admin.

His spot on 1010xl here in Jax during the height of Winstongate was atrocious at best.

FSU cost our program SO MUCH money in revenue sales by trying to slide one by us. Shame on them and shame on Monk for being asleep at the wheel.

Love the tag!

Posted from Rivals Mobile

6/27 3:21 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
If you think that one individual made the decision you're sadly mistaken.
6/27 3:22 PM | IP: Logged
Well, as far as we know Big Bird and Mr. snuffleupagus made the decision. So until ANYONE provides an answer Monk sounds reasonable to me for blame.

Posted from Rivals Mobile

6/27 3:26 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  
6/27 3:27 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
6/27 3:37 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  

I've been a booster since the mid 80s and now work here, not once have i ever considered telling our administration how and what they should do. Honestly if it wasn't for Warchant I would never even think about the logo. I know people like to think we are told what we should and shouldn't say but other than the day they told us about the rebranding and getting ready for the spring game it's never been bought up again. There was no decision to use the 2013 logo, the decision was made to use the national championship logo.
6/27 3:49 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by samdingo:
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
You created that out of thin air. You new logo guys have zero scruples.
6/27 3:49 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by samdingo:

Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
Because in other threads I believe people got information that Monk lead the effort. So maybe it wasn't his idea but rather a project he was tasked with leading. Funny how no one wants to take accountability for their work, which was also said in the other thread.  Own your work and take responsibility and be accountable. If you do a good job you will get credit but you also have to take responsibility when you do bad and admit your mistakes.  I personally like the uniforms minus the logo and think the tribal banding on the collar and the symbols used and the meaning of them is awesome.  The logo though does not seem to have had the same thought process put into it. 
6/27 3:50 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by samdingo:

Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
Bollocks.
6/27 3:52 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by SemiNo.1e:


Originally posted by samdingo:
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
You created that out of thin air. You new logo guys have zero scruples.

So, you're suggesting that Jimbo did not sign off on all of the "rebranding"?
Surely you jest.
6/27 3:57 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by SemiNo.1e:


Originally posted by samdingo:
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
You created that out of thin air. You new logo guys have zero scruples.

I dont get Jimbo being behind this. Why would he be so traditionalist (no uni combos) and say many times we have the best uniform in ball? And then change and want a complete overhaul of the branding? I don't buy it. Plus we have recruited very well with what were the best uniforms in ball.
6/27 4:03 PM | IP: Logged
If you want to blame someone, blame Barron. He had the final say.
6/27 4:07 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by travnole:
Well, as far as we know Big Bird and Mr. snuffleupagus made the decision. So until ANYONE provides an answer Monk sounds reasonable to me for blame.

Posted from Rivals Mobile


Success has many fathers, failure is an orphan.
6/27 4:08 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by jamnolfin:


Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  

I've been a booster since the mid 80s and now work here, not once have i ever considered telling our administration how and what they should do. Honestly if it wasn't for Warchant I would never even think about the logo. I know people like to think we are told what we should and shouldn't say but other than the day they told us about the rebranding and getting ready for the spring game it's never been bought up again. There was no decision to use the 2013 logo, the decision was made to use the national championship logo.

Sure.....
.     

This post was edited on 6/27 4:09 PM by Nolester01

6/27 4:08 PM | IP: Logged
Cardinal, he wasn't. This is a pro logo fantasy. Since ZERO people are touching this thing with a ten foot pole, the pro new logo folk are filling the void with someone untouchable, our football coach. Monk is the #1 suspect as we would logically assume his fingers were all over it. If a football coach has time for logo designing, something's VERRY wrong.
6/27 4:12 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by cardinal_67:

Originally posted by SemiNo.1e:


Originally posted by samdingo:
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
You created that out of thin air. You new logo guys have zero scruples.

I dont get Jimbo being behind this. Why would he be so traditionalist (no uni combos) and say many times we have the best uniform in ball? And then change and want a complete overhaul of the branding? I don't buy it. Plus we have recruited very well with what were the best uniforms in ball.
Are you implying that Jimbo played no part in the redesign of th uniforms and logo?
If Jimbo didn't approve of the redesign of the uniforms-and logo-changes would not have been considered.
If you have issues with either, perhaps you should get off of Monk's back and censure our head coach.
6/27 4:12 PM | IP: Logged
New logo is terrible!

Posted from wireless.rivals.com

6/27 4:20 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by ChopHouse:


Originally posted by cardinal_67:

Originally posted by SemiNo.1e:


Originally posted by samdingo:
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
You created that out of thin air. You new logo guys have zero scruples.

I dont get Jimbo being behind this. Why would he be so traditionalist (no uni combos) and say many times we have the best uniform in ball? And then change and want a complete overhaul of the branding? I don't buy it. Plus we have recruited very well with what were the best uniforms in ball.
Are you implying that Jimbo played no part in the redesign of th uniforms and logo?
If Jimbo didn't approve of the redesign of the uniforms-and logo-changes would not have been considered.
If you have issues with either, perhaps you should get off of Monk's back and censure our head coach.



Im only doubting Jimbo was the ring leader for this. If he was it would be a huge contradiction versus his previous stance on our old uniforms and brand. If in fact he was very involved with this then that would be a huge disappointment for me. Im not completely against change but the new logo was not the answer. At least the final design that is. Don't fix what was never broken. 
6/27 4:37 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by samdingo:

Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  
Someone in another thread said Jimbo was the catalyst for the 'rebrand'. I don't he so much said, I want new logos, uniforms, etc., but that he more or less told the administration that he wanted to reboot things. Keep things fresh for recruiting purposes and the like. Not my words, but it is in the new uniform thread.

From there the admin probably consulted Nike and we got what we got. Jimbo approved/rubber stamped everything would be my guess. I don't know Monk but people blaming him for this are pretty funny.
Samdingo, can you email me?  jamnolfin@hotmail.com
6/27 4:49 PM | IP: Logged
Cloak-and-dagger crap.
6/27 5:00 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by jamnolfin:


Originally posted by Nole3324:


Originally posted by DSTNole:
Jam. Then tell us who exactly is responsible for the initiation and acceptance of the logo rebranding. That way we can get off monks back.
Today is just a day to celebrate in a way we should have been able to since the game was over.  Thanks to whoever made the decision to use the real logo.

DST has a point JAM, you can whisper it here and we will not tell anyone until tomorrow.  

I've been a booster since the mid 80s and now work here, not once have i ever considered telling our administration how and what they should do. Honestly if it wasn't for Warchant I would never even think about the logo. I know people like to think we are told what we should and shouldn't say but other than the day they told us about the rebranding and getting ready for the spring game it's never been bought up again. There was no decision to use the 2013 logo, the decision was made to use the national championship logo.

If Boosters really handles decisions in such a vapid manner, then that's even a bigger problem.  Just so happens they blindly stumbled into the right answer this time.  I have to assume there was a bit more thought put into the decision than what Jam is leading on -- I should hope so at least.  Either way, in this instance, I'm glad they did the right thing by the fans, whether they knew they were doing it or not.
6/27 5:21 PM | IP: Logged
I feel like I am being called to the principal's office.
6/27 5:25 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by ChopHouse:


Originally posted by jamnolfin:


Originally posted by BacardiNole:
Boosters won't take credit for it but this was a very smart decision on their part.  They deserve credit for turning a blind eye to monk's pathetic logo and putting something their customers find palatable.
Your agenda is getting old. Monk has nothing to do with the designs of the new logo, he has many job descriptions but designer is not one of them. A lot of things went on with the athletic department last year and Monk had to be the spokesman at times. He has to be the go between the AD and coaches, boosters, players, fans, etc.. He's texted me at midnight and 5 am the next morning, I have no idea when he sleeps It's a thankless job and we should be proud to have a ex player from our all time team work so hard for us. He's also close with all of our coaches and I'm sure they don't appreciate our own attacking him. 
Monk has done more for our university than all of the toothless logo advocates combined.
It's abominable that we have a few petulent nay-sayers who attack others without any first-hand knowledge of any facts whatsoever.
Monk maybe a perfectly nice, wonderful guy, who works hard 24/7/365 -- that doesn't qualify anyone for any job. It's great that he's excited to give back to his university, just so happens he's made us look pretty bad a few times now and has found himself very tightly connected to the poor logo decision -- now it may very well be the case, but the university has done nothing to date to publicly set the record straight or remove the cloak of secrecy around the process (although I see there's some sort of July info session planned - the content is anyone's guess).

If it wasn't Monk, who all were involved, what were the iterations of the design that were discussed, how were they evaluated, who participated in the focus groups, what feedback was sent to the designers, who was on the committee that finally okayed it, how did they vote (if there was a vote).

I'd image FSU was pretty surprised at the level of uproar, but closing ranks and ignoring public questions isn't in the cards when you're a publicly funded university.  We're a pretty staunch group and I don't think we'll be shutting up anytime soon, at least not without transparency. 

I will ignore the "petulant" comment - I simply want some of this very hard to come by "first-hand knowledge".
6/27 5:27 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by samdingo:
I feel like I am being called to the principal's office.
I think you're about to get a hall monitor badge. Haha.
6/27 5:28 PM | IP: Logged
I know that the logo and how to handle negative reactions has been addressed to the employees of the boosters. Why lie about that? The talking point to be used by booster employees when confronted with a threat to cancel booster dues is "You would hurt the kuds over this?" Raise your hand if this is what you wrte told. I was told this and heard the same from many. Don't lie and claim that the boosters have nit addressed this. It just makes you look bad.

Posted from wireless.rivals.com

6/27 5:31 PM | IP: Logged
Even the booster page has more insults and backlash to cartoon Q boy.... The logo is awful. It's not just Warchant but Facebook etc that show just how many fans hate it.
6/27 5:54 PM | IP: Logged
Pig, you certainly don't let facts get in the way of your angst.
Just about everything that you say in your rant is totally false.
To say that you are a master of stretching the truth is an understatement.
Umm was it not first revealed to the public by a low quality photo taken at a walmart?

People can dispute a lot of things, but I haven't seen anyone dispute the botched unveiling.
How about this little gem from Pig: "3 months after a national title OUR INEPT ADMINISTRATION lets a friggin walmart debut such a monumental event". 
Please point out to me how our admin played any part in the botched unvailing.

Easy. They approved the ugly logo in the first place. 
6/27 6:00 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by jamnolfin:


Originally posted by BacardiNole:
Boosters won't take credit for it but this was a very smart decision on their part.  They deserve credit for turning a blind eye to monk's pathetic logo and putting something their customers find palatable.
Your agenda is getting old. Monk has nothing to do with the designs of the new logo, he has many job descriptions but designer is not one of them. A lot of things went on with the athletic department last year and Monk had to be the spokesman at times. He has to be the go between the AD and coaches, boosters, players, fans, etc.. He's texted me at midnight and 5 am the next morning, I have no idea when he sleeps It's a thankless job and we should be proud to have a ex player from our all time team work so hard for us. He's also close with all of our coaches and I'm sure they don't appreciate our own attacking him. 

Jam,
If Monk is not accountable for the new logo, who is?

This post was edited on 6/27 6:11 PM by NoleGa

6/27 6:04 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by SemiNo.1e:
Cardinal, he wasn't. This is a pro logo fantasy. Since ZERO people are touching this thing with a ten foot pole, the pro new logo folk are filling the void with someone untouchable, our football coach. Monk is the #1 suspect as we would logically assume his fingers were all over it. If a football coach has time for logo designing, something's VERRY wrong.
^^^ SPOT ON!! Blame it on a National Championship Coach who was "responsible" and it won't get much blow back. It's a weak move by the people who were really responsible for this disaster. 
6/27 6:15 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by BacardiNole

Originally posted by samdingo:
I feel like I am being called to the principal's office.
I think you're about to get a hall monitor badge. Haha.



Im no principal

Posted from wireless.rivals.com

6/27 6:22 PM | IP: Logged

Jerry,
 
Do you happen to know who started and approved the rebranding especially the new logo?   Was it Jimbo Fisher? Monk? who?   And if you don't know, who would be a person that did know?  Jimbo? Monk? who? 

Thanks!

6/27 6:22 PM | IP: Logged
Nice.

Posted from wireless.rivals.com

6/27 6:30 PM | IP: Logged
Jam, you've got mail from Rimm.
6/27 6:31 PM | IP: Logged
Jam...  I seriously don't know how you do it man.
6/27 6:38 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by -OB1-:
Jam...  I seriously don't know how you do it man.
What baffles my mind and majority of the FSU fans is a cartoon Q looking walmart boy is trying to be passed off as an actual logo.  
6/27 6:57 PM | IP: Logged

Originally posted by mrcop2you:


Originally posted by -OB1-:
Jam...  I seriously don't know how you do it man.
What baffles my mind and majority of the FSU fans is a cartoon Q looking walmart boy is trying to be passed off as an actual logo.  


Not sure what that has anything to do about Jam being tied to the whipping post, but...


Now about your comment...  I'm not sure how you think the one in your sig looks good, but you do.
6/27 7:32 PM | IP: Logged



Originally posted by MobileAlNole:




Originally posted by stanton:
I am going to join in every single one of these threads until that abomination of a new logo is dead. 


You might wanna pick up the cello, cricket, ballet, or all of the above,. You have a better chance of achieving those goals.



Wrong. This is the beginning of the end for Chief Walmart.
6/27 7:40 PM | IP: Logged



Originally posted by jamnolfin:





Originally posted by BacardiNole:
Boosters won't take credit for it but this was a very smart decision on their part.  They deserve credit for turning a blind eye to monk's pathetic logo and putting something their customers find palatable.


Your agenda is getting old. Monk has nothing to do with the designs of the new logo, he has many job descriptions but designer is not one of them. A lot of things went on with the athletic department last year and Monk had to be the spokesman at times. He has to be the go between the AD and coaches, boosters, players, fans, etc.. He's texted me at midnight and 5 am the next morning, I have no idea when he sleeps It's a thankless job and we should be proud to have a ex player from our all time team work so hard for us. He's also close with all of our coaches and I'm sure they don't appreciate our own attacking him. 




Are you trying to deny that he is one of, if not the primary, proponents of the new logo?
6/27 7:46 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by flmom777:
I know thain here the logo and how to handle negative reactions has been addressed to the employees of the boosters. Why lie about that? The talking point to be used by booster employees when confronted with a threat to cancel booster dues is "You would hurt the kuds over this?" Raise your hand if this is what you wrte told. I was told this and heard the same from many. Don't lie and claim that the boosters have nit addressed this. It just makes you look bad.

Posted from wireless.rivals.com


Nobody has ever told us that. I can't lie on here, I would get called down in a second. Honestly I cant remember the new logo mentioned since before the spring game and I sit in on our marketing meetings every Monday morning. Im out of this conversation, I said I was done before but  I cant stand to see my colleagues attacked over something they have nothing to do with. 
6/27 8:20 PM | IP: Logged
Previous Topic | Next Topic | Back to Topics

Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

LATEST NEWS




Rivals.com is your source for: College Football | Football Recruiting | College Basketball | Basketball Recruiting | College Baseball | High School | College Merchandise
Site-specific editorial/photos © Warchant.com. All rights reserved. This website is an officially and independently operated source of news and information not affiliated with any school or team.
About | Advertise with Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | About our Ads | Terms of Service | Copyright/IP policy | Yahoo! Sports - NBC Sports Network

Statistical information ©2007 STATS LLC All Rights Reserved.